One more system, and one fewer problem.
You are being asked to add RFID to stores that already have too many systems in them. Clarity reconciles against what you run rather than replacing it, integrates on the transports your team already supports, and reads hardware from any manufacturer.
Fewer decisions you cannot reverse.
Most of what makes an RFID program painful for IT is lock-in that surfaces later. These are the four places we designed that out.
No replacement
Clarity reconciles item-level reads against your ERP, WMS, and OMS and returns the corrected picture. Nothing is switched off to run it.
Your transports
REST where your systems can call out, SFTP flat files where they cannot, cloud storage or webhooks where those fit better. We meet the older system on its terms.
Hardware agnostic
A full LLRP implementation rather than a handful of vendor SDKs, so readers are chosen on price and coverage rather than on what the software tolerates.
Room for the exception
Customer-specific plugins for the legacy format nobody else uses, deployed alongside the platform rather than as a fork, so you still get every release.
- Replaces
- Nothing
- Transports
- REST, SFTP, blob, webhook
- Readers
- Any that speak LLRP
- Access
- SSO, four roles
The integration is the project.
Everybody underestimates it, which is why we scope and price it separately and specify every exchange before anything is built. Direction, transport, format, cadence, and what happens when a file arrives late.
What the other teams need to know.
An RFID program touches four other teams, and each arrives with a different question. These are their answers.
Bring your stack to a scoping call.
Tell us what you run and how it likes to exchange data, and you will get a straight answer about the integration before anyone quotes for it.